Here is an example of the real issue being twisted into something it's not. It's not "gay marriage," it's who gets to define terminology, in this case for the word marriage. The constitution clearly does not speak of marriage as a right. It's up to the individual states to determine how to handle this. Do you really want a handful of appointed people deciding what our words mean? I know I don't. The implications here are far greater than same-sex marriage.
No one here is restricting the ability of any particular group from being married. It's just some don't like the way marriage is defined.
No comments:
Post a Comment